Eric Bovan memphis tn obituary and dead, Died December 31

Title: Legal Appeals and Cocaine Conspiracy: The Case of Linda Faye Mims

Linda Faye Mims is currently appealing the district court’s decision that sentenced her to 84 months of imprisonment after being found guilty of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. The charges were filed under 21 U.S.C. sections 841(a)(1) and 846. In her appeal, Mims raises several arguments, including the court’s failure to require a departure motion, the admission of her incriminating statement, the inclusion of a firearm exhibit as evidence, and the denial of her motion for a judgment of acquittal. Here’s an overview of the case:

Background:
Mims’ brother-in-law, Eric Bovan, was identified as the apparent leader of a significant cocaine distribution network operating between Los Angeles and Memphis. Government officials discovered that Mims’ residence on Monett Street in Memphis was being utilized in this illegal network. To gather evidence, the house was placed under video surveillance.

Key Events:
The videotapes captured Eric and Janet Bovan, identified as co-conspirators, entering Mims’ house on September 17, 1987, accompanied by Earl Woods, a government informant. Woods testified that during this visit, the Bovans carried a briefcase containing money. Mims allegedly handed them a sack containing $25,000 to $40,000, which they counted to a total of $100,000 to $170,000.

Woods further testified that on a different occasion, he and another co-conspirator delivered a bag containing seven kilograms of cocaine to Janet Bovan. She allegedly informed Woods that the cocaine was destined for Mims’ house.

Mims’ Legal Arguments:

1. Mims contends that the court erred in not requiring the United States to file a motion for a departure.
2. She argues against the admission of her incriminating statement as evidence.
3. Mims questions the inclusion of a firearm exhibit in the trial.
4. The denial of her motion for a judgment of acquittal is another point of contention.

Appeal Outcome:
The appellate court affirms the district court’s judgment, rejecting Mims’ arguments. The legal proceedings highlight the intricate details of the cocaine distribution network, with Mims implicated through surveillance footage and informant testimony.

As the legal process unfolds, the case serves as a complex example of the legal intricacies surrounding conspiracy to distribute controlled substances.